4.6 Article

Scalp-recorded high-frequency oscillations in atypical benign partial epilepsy

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 10, 页码 3306-3313

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.07.013

关键词

High-frequency oscillation; Atypical benign partial epilepsy; Methylprednisolone treatment; Scalp EEG; Time-frequency analysis

资金

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy [2015DXBL03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate how high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were affected by methylprednisolone treatment and the clinical significance of HFOs in patients with atypical benign partial epilepsy (ABPE). Methods: In 14 ABPE patients with methylprednisolone treatment, we measured interictal HFOs and spikes during sleep in pre- and post-methylprednisolone scalp electroencephalography (EEG). Patients with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) were taken as control. Results: Before methylprednisolone treatment, 10/14 ABPE patients had HFOs, with a mean value of 85.79 per 60 s per patient, while 2/14 BECTS patients had HFOs with a mean value of 1.86 per 60 s per patient (p = 0.006). The 10 ABPE patients with HFOs tended to have more frequent epileptic negative myoclonus/atypical absences than the other 4 ABPE patients without HFOs. Rates reduced by methylprednisolone treatment were statistically significant for both spikes (p = 0.027) and HFOs (p = 0.005). The percentage of reduction was 41.8% (4653/11,133) and 95% (1141/1202) for spikes and HFOs, respectively. Conclusion: Proportion and rates of HFOs in ABPE were more prevalent than in BECTS. HFO rates reduced by methylprednisolone treatment might be more significant than spike rates. Significance: Prevalence of HFOs reflected at least some aspect of epileptic severity of ABPE. HFOs were more sensitive to methylprednisolone treatment than spikes. (C) 2016 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据