4.6 Article

Multichannel one-dimensional convolutional neural network-based feature learning for fault diagnosis of industrial processes

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 3085-3104

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05171-4

关键词

Industrial process; Fault diagnosis; Wavelet transform; Convolutional neural network; Feature learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71777173]
  2. Action Plan for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19511106303]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a new deep neural network model MC1-DCNN, which learns fault features from high-dimensional process signals using wavelet transform, achieving remarkable feature extraction and fault diagnosis performance.
In industrial processes, the noise and high dimension of process signals usually affect the performance of those methods in fault detection and diagnosis. A predominant property of a fault diagnosis model is to extract effective features from process signals. Wavelet transform is capable of extracting multiscale information that provides effective fault features in time and frequency domain of process signals. In this paper, a new deep neural network (DNN), multichannel one-dimensional convolutional neural network (MC1-DCNN), is proposed to investigate feature learning from high-dimensional process signals. Wavelet transform is used to extract multiscale components with fault features from process signals. MC1-DCNN is able to learn discriminative time-frequency features from these multiscale process signals. Tennessee Eastman process and fed-batch fermentation penicillin process are adopted to verify performance of the proposed method. The experimental results demonstrate remarkable feature extraction and fault diagnosis performance of MC1-DCNN and show prosperous possibility of applying this method to industrial processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据