4.6 Article

Identification of epileptic high frequency oscillations in the time domain by using MEG beamformer-based virtual sensors

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 197-208

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.008

关键词

High frequency oscillations; Magnetoencephalography; Epilepsy; Beamforming; Virtual electrodes

资金

  1. Dutch Brain Foundation fund [2013-139]
  2. Dutch Epilepsy Foundation fund [15-09]
  3. Rudolf Magnus Institute Talent Fellowship
  4. ZonMW [veni 91615149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: High frequency oscillations (HFOs, > 80 Hz) are biomarkers for epileptogenic cortex in invasive and non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG). Identification of HFOs in magnetoencephalography (MEG) is hindered by noise. Computing spatial filters using beamforming to reconstruct time series for selected brain regions, so-called virtual sensors (VS), can increase the signal-to-noise ratio. We identified HFOs in MEG in time domain using VS. Methods: Fifteen minutes of MEG data were selected from 12 patients. VS were placed around the epileptic spikes (affected region) and in the contralateral hemisphere. VS and physical sensors were reviewed for HFOs and spikes. HFO locations were compared to spikes and other clinical parameters. Results: Eight patients showed 78 time points with 575 HFOs in VS, 513 were in the affected region. HFOs could not be identified in physical sensors for 61 of the 78 VS time points. HFOs overlapped with presumed epileptogenic areas and were also visible in unfiltered VS signals. Conclusion: Beamformer-based VS analysis can help to identify epileptic HFOs that are not discernable in physical MEG sensors. Significance: This approach can be extended to enable localization of non-invasively recorded HFOs. This would help surgical planning and reduce the need for invasive diagnostics. (C) 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据