4.5 Article

Curcumin protects thymus against D-galactose-induced senescence in mice

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-020-01945-8

关键词

Thymus; Senescence; Autoimmune regulator; D-galactose; Curcumin

资金

  1. Youth Development Fund from School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, China [JCYXY2016-YQ-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that curcumin treatment can improve thymic structure in older mice induced by D-gal, increase the number of proliferating cells, decrease the number of apoptotic cells, and slow down thymus aging by upregulating Aire expression.
Senescence-related decline of thymus affects immune function in the elderly population and contributes to the prevalence of many relevant diseases like cancer, autoimmune diseases, and other chronic diseases. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effects of curcumin, an agent that could counter aging, and explored its optimal intake and the alteration of autoimmune regulator (Aire) after curcumin treatment in the D-galactose (D-gal)-induced accelerated aging mice. ICR mice were intraperitoneally injected with D-gal for 8 weeks to establish the accelerated aging model and given curcumin with 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg body weight per day by gavage, respectively, for 6 weeks. It indicated that the D-gal-treated mice developed structural changes in the thymi compared with the control group without D-gal and curcumin treatment. As the supplements of curcumin, it resulted in a restoration of the normal thymic anatomy with an increase of proliferating cells and a reduction of apoptotic cells in the thymi of the D-gal-induced aging model mice. Curcumin administration could also expand the expression level of Aire from mRNA level and protein level. The current study demonstrated that curcumin could ameliorate senescence-related thymus involution via upregulating Aire expression, suggesting that curcumin can rejuvenate senescence-associated alterations of thymus induced by D-gal accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据