4.5 Article

A thermostable, closed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 934-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-020-0478-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [ERC-CoG-648432 MEMBRANEFUSION]
  2. Medical Research Council as part of United Kingdom Research and Innovation [MC_UP_A025_1011, MC_UP_A025_1013, MC_UP_1201/16, MC_U105181010]
  3. 100 Top Talents Program of Sun Yat-sen University
  4. Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship [207498/Z/17/Z]
  5. MRC [MC_UP_1201/16, MC_UP_A025_1013, MC_UP_A025_1011, MC_U105181010] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 mediates receptor binding and cell entry and is the dominant target of the immune system. It exhibits substantial conformational flexibility. It transitions from closed to open conformations to expose its receptor-binding site and, subsequently, from prefusion to postfusion conformations to mediate fusion of viral and cellular membranes. S-protein derivatives are components of vaccine candidates and diagnostic assays, as well as tools for research into the biology and immunology of SARS-CoV-2. Here we have designed mutations in S that allow the production of thermostable, disulfide-bonded S-protein trimers that are trapped in the closed, prefusion state. Structures of the disulfide-stabilized and non-disulfide-stabilized proteins reveal distinct closed and locked conformations of the S trimer. We demonstrate that the designed, thermostable, closed S trimer can be used in serological assays. This protein has potential applications as a reagent for serology, virology and as an immunogen. The SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein is flexible, and its receptor-binding domain (RBD) fluctuates between open and closed conformations. Disulfide bonds are engineered into the spike ectodomain to lock the RBD in the closed state, leading to a construct with high thermostability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据