4.8 Article

Sub-nanometre resolution in single-molecule photoluminescence imaging

期刊

NATURE PHOTONICS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 693-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-020-0677-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0200600, 2017YFA0303500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB36000000]
  4. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies
  5. Basque Government [IT1164-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through the use of a plasmon-active atomically sharp tip and an ultrathin insulating film, and precise junction control in a highly confined nanocavity plasmon field at the scanning tunnelling microscope junction, sub-nanometre-resolved single-molecule near-field photoluminescence imaging with a spatial resolution down to similar to 8 angstrom is achieved. Ambitions to reach atomic resolution with light have been a major force in shaping nano-optics, whereby a central challenge is achieving highly localized optical fields. A promising approach employs plasmonic nanoantennas, but fluorescence quenching in the vicinity of metallic structures often imposes a strict limit on the attainable spatial resolution, and previous studies have reached only 8 nm resolution in fluorescence mapping. Here, we demonstrate spatially and spectrally resolved photoluminescence imaging of a single phthalocyanine molecule coupled to nanocavity plasmons in a tunnelling junction with a spatial resolution down to similar to 8 angstrom and locally map the molecular exciton energy and linewidth at sub-molecular resolution. This remarkable resolution is achieved through an exquisite nanocavity control, including tip-apex engineering with an atomistic protrusion, quenching management through emitter-metal decoupling and sub-nanometre positioning precision. Our findings provide new routes to optical imaging, spectroscopy and engineering of light-matter interactions at sub-nanometre scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据