4.8 Review

Perspectives for electrochemical capacitors and related devices

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1151-1163

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0747-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Labex Store-Ex)
  2. Institut Universitaire de France
  3. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures, and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science
  4. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures, and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical capacitors can store electrical energy harvested from intermittent sources and deliver energy quickly, but increased energy density is required for flexible and wearable electronics and larger equipment. Progress in materials and devices and key perspectives in this field are outlined. Electrochemical capacitors can store electrical energy harvested from intermittent sources and deliver energy quickly, but their energy density must be increased if they are to efficiently power flexible and wearable electronics, as well as larger equipment. This Review summarizes progress in the field of materials for electrochemical capacitors over the past decade as well as outlines key perspectives for future research. We describe electrical double-layer capacitors based on high-surface-area carbons, pseudocapacitive materials such as oxides and the two-dimensional inorganic compounds known as MXenes, and emerging microdevices for the Internet of Things. We show that new nanostructured electrode materials and matching electrolytes are required to maximize the amount of energy and speed of delivery, and different manufacturing methods will be needed to meet the requirements of the future generation of electronic devices. Scientifically justified metrics for testing, comparison and optimization of various kinds of electrochemical capacitors are provided and explained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据