4.8 Article

Corona structures driven by plume-lithosphere interactions and evidence for ongoing plume activity on Venus

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 547-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0606-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [NNX14AG51G]
  2. SNF [200021_182069]
  3. EU
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_182069] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  5. NASA [684062, NNX14AG51G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the absence of global plate tectonics, mantle convection and plume-lithosphere interaction are the main drivers of surface deformation on Venus. Among documented tectonic structures, circular volcano-tectonic features known as coronae may be the clearest surface manifestations of mantle plumes and hold clues to the global Venusian tectonic regime. Yet, the exact processes underlying coronae formation and the reasons for their diverse morphologies remain controversial. Here we use three-dimensional thermomechanical numerical simulations of impingement of a thermal mantle plume on the Venusian lithosphere to assess the origin and diversity of large Venusian coronae. The ability of the mantle plume to penetrate into the Venusian lithosphere results in four main outcomes: lithospheric dripping, short-lived subduction, embedded plume and plume underplating. During the first three scenarios, plume penetration and spreading induce crustal thickness variations that eventually lead to a final topographic isostasy-driven topographic inversion from circular trenches surrounding elevated interiors to raised rims surrounding inner depressions, as observed on many Venusian coronae. Different corona structures may represent not only different styles of plume-lithosphere interactions but also different stages in evolution. A morphological analysis of large existing coronae leads to the conclusion that at least 37 large coronae (including the largest Artemis corona) are active, providing evidence for widespread ongoing plume activity on Venus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据