4.8 Article

Landscape of G-quadruplex DNA structural regions in breast cancer

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 878-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0672-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Cambridge
  2. Cancer Research UK [C14303/A17197, C9681/A18618, C9681/A29214]
  3. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [209441/z/17/z]
  4. Balasubramanian group
  5. Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne
  6. Cancer Research UK program
  7. MRC [MC_UU_00002/16] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Wellcome Trust [209441/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Response and resistance to anticancer therapies vary due to intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity(1). Here, we map differentially enriched G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structure-forming regions ( increment G4Rs) in 22 breast cancer patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models. increment G4Rs are associated with the promoters of highly amplified genes showing high expression, and with somatic single-nucleotide variants. Differences in Delta G4R landscapes reveal seven transcription factor programs across PDTXs. increment G4R abundance and locations stratify PDTXs into at least three G4-based subtypes. increment G4Rs in most PDTXs (14 of 22) were found to associate with more than one breast cancer subtype, which we also call an integrative cluster (IC)(2). This suggests the frequent coexistence of multiple breast cancer states within a PDTX model, the majority of which display aggressive triple-negative IC10 gene activity. Short-term cultures of PDTX models with increased increment G4R levels are more sensitive to small molecules targeting G4 DNA. Thus, G4 landscapes reveal additional IC-related intratumor heterogeneity in PDTX biopsies, improving breast cancer stratification and potentially identifying new treatment strategies. Quantitative ChIP-seq analysis maps G-quadruplex (G4) DNA structures in breast cancer patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX) models. G4-based subtypes highlight additional tumor heterogeneity in the integrative cluster (IC) system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据