4.8 Article

CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 41-46

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0609-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RM1 HG009490, R35 GM118158]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Safe Genes Program [HR0011-17-2-0042]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (the German Research Foundation) [416375182]
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds MD fellowship
  5. Desmond and Ann Heathwood Massachusetts General Hospital Research Scholar Award
  6. Robert B. Colvin, M.D. Endowed Chair in Pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents two base editor architectures that can efficiently induce targeted C-to-G base transversions, with reduced levels of unwanted mutations. These new base editors hold promise for optimizing C-to-G base editors for both research and therapeutic applications.
CRISPR-guided DNA cytosine and adenine base editors are widely used for many applications(1-4)but primarily create DNA base transitions (that is, pyrimidine-to-pyrimidine or purine-to-purine). Here we describe the engineering of two base editor architectures that can efficiently induce targeted C-to-G base transversions, with reduced levels of unwanted C-to-W (W = A or T) and indel mutations. One of these C-to-G base editors (CGBE1), consists of an RNA-guided Cas9 nickase, anEscherichia coli-derived uracil DNA N-glycosylase (eUNG) and a rat APOBEC1 cytidine deaminase variant (R33A) previously shown to have reduced off-target RNA and DNA editing activities(5,6). We show that CGBE1 can efficiently induce C-to-G edits, particularly in AT-rich sequence contexts in human cells. We also removed the eUNG domain to yield miniCGBE1, which reduced indel frequencies but only modestly decreased editing efficiency. CGBE1 and miniCGBE1 enable C-to-G edits and will serve as a basis for optimizing C-to-G base editors for research and therapeutic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据