4.8 Article

Structures of metabotropic GABABreceptor

期刊

NATURE
卷 584, 期 7820, 页码 310-+

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2469-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 NS092695]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryo-electron microscopy structures of heterodimeric and homodimeric full-length GABA(B)receptors, combined with cellular signalling assays, shed light on the mechanisms that underpin signal transduction mediated by these receptors. Stimulation of the metabotropic GABA(B)receptor by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) results in prolonged inhibition of neurotransmission, which is central to brain physiology(1). GABA(B)belongs to family C of the G-protein-coupled receptors, which operate as dimers to transform synaptic neurotransmitter signals into a cellular response through the binding and activation of heterotrimeric G proteins(2,3). However, GABA(B)is unique in its function as an obligate heterodimer in which agonist binding and G-protein activation take place on distinct subunits(4,5). Here we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of heterodimeric and homodimeric full-length GABA(B)receptors. Complemented by cellular signalling assays and atomistic simulations, these structures reveal that extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) of GABA(B)has an essential role in relaying structural transitions by ordering the linker that connects the extracellular ligand-binding domain to the transmembrane region. Furthermore, the ECL2 of each of the subunits of GABA(B)caps and interacts with the hydrophilic head of a phospholipid that occupies the extracellular half of the transmembrane domain, thereby providing a potentially crucial link between ligand binding and the receptor core that engages G proteins. These results provide a starting framework through which to decipher the mechanistic modes of signal transduction mediated by GABA(B)dimers, and have important implications for rational drug design that targets these receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据