4.8 Article

Ag doped urchin-like α-MnO2 toward efficient and bifunctional electrocatalysts for Li-O2 batteries

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 2356-2364

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-2855-0

关键词

Li-O-2 batteries; Ag doped urchin-like MnO2; electronic structure; cycling stability

资金

  1. High-level Talents' Discipline Construction Fund of Shandong University [31370089963078]
  2. Shandong Provincial Science and Technology Major Project [2016GGX104001, 2017CXGC1010, 2018JMRH0211]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2016JC005, 2017JC042, 2017JC010]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017MEM002]
  5. School Research Startup Expenses of Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen) [DD29100027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rechargeable Li-O(2)batteries (LOBs) have been receiving intensive attention because of their ultra-high theoretical energy density close to the gasoline. Herein, Ag modified urchin-like alpha-MnO2(Ag-MnO2) material with hierarchical porous structure is obtained by a facile one-step hydrothermal method. Ag-MnO(2)possesses thick nanowires and presents hierarchical porous structure of mesopores and macropores. The unique structure can expose more active sites, and provide continuous pathways for O(2)and discharge products as well. The doping of Ag leads to the change of electronic distribution in a-MnO2(i.e., more oxygen vacancies), which play important roles in improving their intrinsic catalytic activity and conductivity. As a result, LOBs with Ag-MnO(2)catalysts exhibit lower overpotential, higher discharge specific capacity and much better cycle stability compared to pure alpha-MnO2. LOBs with Ag-MnO(2)catalysts exhibit a superior discharge specific capacity of 13,131 mAhg(-1)at a current density of 200 mAg(-1), a good cycle stability of 500 cycles at the capacity of 500 mAhg(-1). When current density is increased to 400 mAg(-1), LOBs still retain a long lifespan of 170 cycles at a limited capacity of 1,000 mAhg(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据