4.8 Article

Rod-shape inorganic biomimetic mutual-reinforcing MnO2-Au nanozymes for catalysis-enhanced hypoxic tumor therapy

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 2246-2258

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-2844-3

关键词

nanozyme; self-supplied; mutual-reinforcing; hypoxia; catalysis-enhanced therapy

资金

  1. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by Tianjin [0701320001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971106, 81372124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomimetic nanozymes possessing natural enzyme-mimetic activities have been extensively applied in nanocatalytic tumor therapy. However, engineering hybrid biomimetic nanozymes to achieve superior nanozyme activity remained to be an intractable challenge in hypoxic tumors. Herein, a rod-like biomimetic hybrid inorganic MnO2-Au nanozymes are developed, where MnO2 and ultrasmall Au nanoparticles (NPs) are successively deposited on the mesoporous silica nanorod to cooperatively improve the O-2 content and thermal sensitivity of hypoxic solid tumors guided by multi-modal imaging. Under the catalyzing of MnO2, the intratumoral H2O2 is decomposed to greatly accelerate O-2 generation, which could boost the curative effect of radiation therapy (RT) and further enhance the Au-catalyzed glucose oxidation. Mutually, the Au NPs can steadily and efficiently catalyze the oxidation of glucose in harsh tumor microenvironment, thus sensitizing tumor cells to thermal ablation for mild photothermal therapy and further promoting the catalytic efficiency of MnO2 with the self-supplied H2O2/H+. As a result, this mutual-reinforcing cycle can endow the nanoplatform with accelerated O-2 generation, thus alleviating hypoxic environment and further boosting RT effect. Furthermore, acute glucose consuming can induce downregulation expression of heat shock protein (HSP), achieving starvation-promoted mild photothermal therapy. This synthesized hybrid nanozymes proves to be a versatile theranostic agent for nanocatalytic cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据