4.2 Article

No bull: dung-dwelling mushrooms show reproductive trait syndromes different from their non-coprophilous allies

期刊

MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 817-824

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-020-01604-5

关键词

Agaricales; Fruit body size; Spore size; Wall thickness; Melanisation; Resource partitioning; Ecomorphology

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spores of most coprophilous mushrooms require passage through a mammalian gut. Guts and faeces constitute a chemically and microbially aggressive environment. Hence, the spores need to be armed, e.g. by melanisation and thick walls, possibly leading to large spores due to volume constraints. Conversely, litter is a less stressful substrate that may become colonised by mushrooms with less fortified spores. Compared with litter, dung pats are spatially constrained, which limits mycelial growth. Small mycelia can only produce small fruit bodies. Moreover, on quickly perishing faeces, fruiting takes place under fierce competition by microbes and dung-dwelling invertebrates. Therefore, coprophilous mushrooms are forced to mature fast, implying small fruit bodies as well. Competition in spatially less constrained litter substrates can be pronounced but should not lead to quick nutrient depletion as in dung, hence would allow for mushroom assemblages with on average larger fruit bodies. To find evidence for our assumptions, we compiled a database of fruit body and spore sizes of mushroom genera which contain coprophilous species, comprising 633 (including ca. 20% coprophilous) species across 18 genera worldwide. The data set was subjected to a phylogenetically informed statistical analysis. Our hypotheses were confirmed though the selective pressure of the faecal environment appears to be more forceful on spores considering the fact that the mean spore size differences are more pronounced than differences in mean fruit body size. It would be worthwhile to further elucidate this phenomenon and the coprophilous trait syndrome in general with molecular methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据