4.7 Article

Soft X-ray emission lines in the X-ray binary Swift J1858.6-0814 observed with XMM-Newton Reflection Grating Spectrometer: disc atmosphere or wind?

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2258

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; stars: neutron; X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Juan de la Cierva (Spanish State Research Agency) Fellowship [IJCI-2016-30867]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Fellowship [RYC-2015-18148]
  4. Spanish MINECO grant [AYA2017-83216-P]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  6. STFC [ST/M001326/1, ST/R000638/1]
  7. Vidi grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific research (NWO)
  8. Royal Society International Exchanges `The first step for HighEnergy Astrophysics relations between Argentina and UK'
  9. ESA Member States
  10. NASA
  11. Royal Society through the Newton International Fellowship programme
  12. STFC [ST/M001326/1, ST/R000638/1, ST/R000506/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We find soft X-ray emission lines from the X-ray binary Swift J1858.6-0814 in data from XMM-Newton Reflection Grating Spectrometer (RGS): NVII, OVII, and OVIII, as well as notable residuals short of a detection at Ne IX and other higher ionization transitions. These could be associated with the disc atmosphere, as in accretion disc corona sources, or with a wind, as has been detected in Swift J1858.6-0814 in emission lines at optical wavelengths. Indeed, the NVII line is redshifted, consistent with being the emitting component of a P-Cygni profile. We find that the emitting plasma has an ionization parameter log (xi) = 1.35 +/- 0.2 and a density n > 1.5 x 10(11) cm(-3). From this, we infer that the emitting plasma must be within 10(13) cm of the ionizing source, similar to 5 x 10(7) r(g) for a 1.4 M-circle dot neutron star, and from the line width that it is at least 10(4) r(g) away [2 x 10(9)(M/1.4M(circle dot)) cm]. We compare this with known classes of emission-line regions in other X-ray binaries and active galactic nuclei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据