4.7 Article

The Pristine Inner Galaxy Survey (PIGS) II: Uncovering the most metal-poor populations in the inner Milky Way

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1661

关键词

techniques: photometric; techniques: spectroscopic; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: Population II; Galaxy: bulge; Galaxy: stellar content

资金

  1. Chilean National Telescope Allocation Committee [CN2017B-37, CN2018A-20, CN2018B-46, CN2019A-98, CN2019B-31]
  2. Emmy Noether program from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  3. French National Research Agency (ANR) funded project 'Pristine' [ANR18-CE31-0017]
  4. INSU
  5. CNRS through the Programme National Galaxies et Cosmologie
  6. CNRS [PICS07708]
  7. Leverhulme Trust
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  9. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council through CREATE training program on New Technologies for Canadian Observatories
  10. Australian Research Council [DP180101791]
  11. Spanish Min-istry of Science and Innovation (MICIIN) [MICIIN AYA2017-86389-P]
  12. Spanish MICIIN under 2013 Ramon y Cajal program [MICIIN RYC-2013-14875]
  13. Chilean Centro de Excelencia en Astrofisicay Tecnologias Afines (CATA) BASAL grant [AFB-170002]
  14. Direccion de Investigacion y Desarrollo de la Universidad de La Serena through the Programa de Incentivo a la Investigacion de Academicos (PIA-DIDULS)
  15. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [730890]
  16. International Space Science Institute, Bern, Switzerland
  17. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg
  18. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching
  19. Johns Hopkins University
  20. Durham University
  21. University of Edinburgh
  22. Queen's University Belfast
  23. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  24. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated
  25. National Central University of Taiwan
  26. Space Telescope Science Institute
  27. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  28. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  29. University of Maryland
  30. Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE)
  31. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  32. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  33. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  34. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-poor stars are important tools for tracing the early history of the Milky Way, and for learning about the first generations of stars. Simulations suggest that the oldest metal-poor stars are to be found in the inner Galaxy. Typical bulge surveys, however, lack low metallicity ([Fe/H] < -1.0) stars because the inner Galaxy is predominantly metal-rich. The aim of the Pristine Inner Galaxy Survey (PIGS) is to study the metal-poor and very metal-poor (VMP, [Fe/H] < -2.0) stars in this region. In PIGS, metal-poor targets for spectroscopic follow-up are selected from metallicity-sensitive CaHK photometry from the CFHT. This work presents the similar to 250 deg(2) photometric survey as well as intermediate-resolution spectroscopic follow-up observations for similar to 8000 stars using AAOmega on the AAT. The spectra are analysed using two independent tools: ULySS with an empirical spectral library, and FERRE with a library of synthetic spectra. The comparison between the two methods enables a robust determination of the stellar parameters and their uncertainties. We present a sample of 1300 VMP stars - the largest sample of VMP stars in the inner Galaxy to date. Additionally, our spectroscopic data set includes similar to 1700 horizontal branch stars, which are useful metal-poor standard candles. We furthermore show that PIGS photometry selects VMP stars with unprecedented efficiency: 86 per cent/80 per cent (lower/higher extinction) of the best candidates satisfy [Fe/H] < -2.0, as do 80 per cent/63 per cent of a larger, less strictly selected sample. We discuss future applications of this unique data set that will further our understanding of the chemical and dynamical evolution of the innermost regions of our Galaxy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据