4.7 Article

From birth associations to field stars: mapping the small-scale orbit distribution in the Galactic disc

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1358

关键词

stars: distances; stars: statistics; Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. InternationalMax Planck Research School forAstronomy and Cosmic Physics at Heidelberg University (IMPRS-HD)
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [321035]
  3. DLR (German space agency) [50QG1403]
  4. [SFB 881]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [321035] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stars born at the same time in the same place should have formed from gas of the same element composition. But most stars subsequently disperse from their birth siblings, in orbit and orbital phase, becoming 'field stars'. Here, we explore and provide direct observational evidence for this process in the Milky Way disc, by quantifying the probability that orbit-similarity among stars implies indistinguishable metallicity. We define the orbit similarity among stars through their distance in action-angle space, Delta(J, theta), and their abundance similarity simply by Delta[Fe/H]. Analysing a sample of main-sequence stars from Gala DR2 and LAMOST, we find an excess of pairs with the same metallicity (Delta[Fe/H] < 0.1) that extends to remarkably large separations in Delta(J, theta) that correspond to nearly 1 kpc distances. We assess the significance of this effect through a mock sample, drawn from a smooth and phase-mixed orbit distribution. Through grouping such star pairs into associations with a friend-of-friends algorithm linked by Delta(J,theta), we find 100s of mono-abundance groups with >= 3 (to greater than or similar to 20) members; these groups - some clusters, some spread across the sky - are over an order-of-magnitude more abundant than expected for a smooth phase-space distribution, suggesting that we are witnessing the `dissolution' of stellar birth associations into the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据