4.7 Article

Methods for identifying and interpreting sex-linked SNP markers and carrying out sex assignment: application to thornback ray (Raja clavata)

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 1610-1619

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13225

关键词

association-based approach; F(ST)outlier analysis; neural net; sex assignment error; sex-determination system; sex-linked SNP; thornback ray

资金

  1. H2020 Environment [773713]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE02-0006-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sex-determining modes remain unknown in numerous species, notably in fishes, in which a variety of modalities have been reported. Additionally, noninvasive individual sexing is problematic for species without external sex attributes or for early life stages, requiring cytogenetic or molecular analyses when sex chromosomes or sex-linked markers have been characterized. Genomics now provide a means to achieve this. Here, we review common sex-determination systems and corresponding statistical methods for identifying sex-linked genetic markers and their use for sex assignment, focusing on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers derived from reduced representation sequencing methods. We demonstrate the dependence of expected sex assignment error on the number of sex-linked SNPs and minor allele frequency. The application of three methods was made here: (a) identification of heterozygote excess in one sex, (b)F(ST)outlier analysis between the two sexes and (c) neuronal net modelling. These methods were applied to a large SNP data set (4604 SNPs) for 1680 thornback rays (Raja clavata). Using method (a), nineteen putative sex-linked SNPs were identified. Comparison with the reference genome of a related species (Amblyraja radiata) indicated that all 19 SNPs are probably located on the same chromosome. These results suggest that thornback ray has a XX/XY sex-determination system. Method (b) identified eight SNPs probably located on different chromosomes. Method (a) led to the lowest sex assignment error among the three methods (4.2% error for females and 3.7% for males).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据