4.7 Article

Catalytic performance of ferrierite and omega zeolites obtained through 2D-3D-3D transformation from Na-RUB-18 layered silicate

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110216

关键词

Na-RUB-18 layered silicate; Ferrierite zeolite; Omega zeolite; Interzeolitic transformation; Catalysis; Ethanol dehydration

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa no Estado de Sao Paulo -FAPESP [2014/06942-0]
  2. FAPESP [2013/25706-3]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Cientifica e Tecnologica (CNPq)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic zeolites have been consistently preferred for industrial and commercial purposes because of their uniform crystalline structure, highly pure composition and the possibility to modulate their intrinsic properties during the crystallization aiming at specific applications. This work explores an original hydrothermal route to obtain ferrierite zeolite using the layered silicate Na-RUB-18 as precursor. For that, the transformation was carried out in the presence of aluminum isopropoxide in various Si/Al molar ratios and using pyrrolidine or 1,3-diaminepropane as OSDA. The hydrothermal transformation from Na-RUB-18 led to pure ferrierite zeolite without other zeolitic crystalline phases. Also, omega zeolite was obtained through an interzeolitic conversion, in which the ferrierite was the parent structure. The samples were characterized by XRD, Al-27 and Si-29 MAS-NMR, SEM, XRF and NH3-TPD. In addition, the catalytic properties of the ferrierite and omega zeolites obtained were studied. The acid characteristics of these materials were evidenced by the high ethanol conversion presented and by the major dehydration to ethylene, a product catalyzed by Bronsted acid sites. Ferrierite synthesized using 1,3-diaminopropane as OSDA in particular showed promising catalytic performance, a result possibly related to the nanosized crystals obtained, in the shape of aggregated sheets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据