4.7 Article

PEG-PtS2 nanosheet-based fluorescence biosensor for label-free human papillomavirus genotyping

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 187, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-020-04383-8

关键词

Platinum disulfide nanosheets; DNA fluorescence biosensor; Ultrasonication-assisted liquid exfoliation method; Polyethylene glycol modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21605160]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20171387]
  3. Double First-Class University project [CPU2018GY25]
  4. Jiangsu Innovation and Enterpreneurship Project
  5. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics Southeast University
  6. Young Teachers' Research Funding from College of Science, China Pharmaceutical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and efficient ultrasonication-assisted liquid exfoliation method is proposed to produce PtS2 nanosheets on a large scale and improve their dispersion in aqueous solution by surface polyethylene glycol modification. The interaction of polyethylene glycol-modified PtS2 (PEG-PtS2) nanosheets with fluorescent labeled DNA and the fluorescence quenching mechanism using FAM-labeled hpv16e6 gene fragment as a probe was investigated. The excitation and emission wavelengths were 468 and 517 nm, respectively. The fluorescence quenching mechanism of PEG-PtS2 nanosheets for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) might stem from the static quenching effect. Based on the difference in fluorescence quenching capability of PEG-PtS2 nanosheets in fluorescent probe tagged single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and dsDNA, a mix-and-detect method was proposed for determination of DNA. Without the need for probe immobilization and tedious washing steps, the genotyping of human papillomavirus (HPV) was easily achieved. The limit of detection was calculated to 0.44 nM, showing a good linear range within 0.05-10 nM. We believe this biosensor provides opportunities to develop a simple and low-cost strategy for molecular diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据