4.7 Article

Parental Care Alters the Egg Microbiome of Maritime Earwigs

期刊

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 920-934

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01558-x

关键词

Microbiome; Vertical transmission; Anisolabis maritima; Parental care; Eggs; Earwigs

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1258133]
  2. NSF [DBI1427772, DEB-1745411, DEB-175037]
  3. Miseq Mini Grant
  4. MBRS-RISE fellowship via the National Institutes of Health [R25-GM059298]
  5. Genentech Foundation MS Dissertation Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recruitment of beneficial microbes to protect offspring, often reducing the energetic costs of care, is now recognized as an important component of parental care in many animals. Studies on earwigs (order Dermaptera) have revealed that removal of females from egg tending increases mortality of eggs due to fungal infections, possibly caused by changes in the bacterial microbiome on the egg surface. We used a controlled female-removal experiment to evaluate whether female nest attendance in the maritime earwig,Anisolabis maritima, influences the bacterial microbiome on the egg surface. Further, we analyzed the microbiomes of mothers and their eggs to determine if there are a core set of bacteria transferred to eggs through female care. Microbiomes were analyzed using 16S rRNA bacterial DNA sequencing, revealing that bacterial operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness and diversity were both significantly higher for female attended versus unattended eggs. The core microbiome of adult females contained bacteria which have the potential to carry anti-fungal characteristics; these bacteria were found in higher presence and relative abundance on eggs where females were allowed to provide care. These results demonstrate that female egg attendance significantly impacts the bacterial microbiome ofA. maritimaeggs, and identifies specific bacteria within the egg microbiome that should be investigated further for beneficial anti-fungal properties in this system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据