4.7 Article

Impact of Nutritional Stress on Honeybee Gut Microbiota, Immunity, andNosema ceranaeInfection

期刊

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 80, 期 4, 页码 908-919

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01538-1

关键词

Apis mellifera; Colony losses; Pollen; Nutritional stress; Pathogens; Microbiota

资金

  1. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica, Uruguay [CSIC 6406]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion, Uruguay [POS_NAC_2013_1_12228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honeybees are important pollinators, having an essential role in the ecology of natural and agricultural environments. Honeybee colony losses episodes reported worldwide and have been associated with different pests and pathogens, pesticide exposure, and nutritional stress. This nutritional stress is related to the increase in monoculture areas which leads to a reduction of pollen availability and diversity. In this study, we examined whether nutritional stress affects honeybee gut microbiota, bee immunity, and infection byNosema ceranae, under laboratory conditions. Consumption ofEucalyptus grandispollen was used as a nutritionally poor-quality diet to study nutritional stress, in contraposition to the consumption of polyfloral pollen. Honeybees feed withEucalyptus grandispollen showed a lower abundance ofLactobacillus melliferandLactobacillus apis(Firm-4 and Firm-5, respectively) andBifidobacteriumspp. and a higher abundance ofBartonella apis, than honeybees fed with polyfloral pollen. Besides the impact of nutritional stress on honeybee microbiota, it also decreased the expression levels of vitellogenin and genes associated to immunity (glucose oxidase, hymenoptaecin and lysozyme). Finally,Eucalyptus grandispollen favored the multiplication ofNosema ceranae. These results show that nutritional stress impacts the honeybee gut microbiota, having consequences on honeybee immunity and pathogen development. Those results may be useful to understand the influence of modern agriculture on honeybee health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据