4.3 Article

Use of anti-platelet agents after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 85-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.11.012

关键词

Neurotrauma; Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage; Blunt cerebral vascular injury; Antiplatelet therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with starting anti-platelet therapy (APT) after acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) and to examine the frequency of thrombotic complications. Patients and methods: We retrospectively identified all patients admitted to our institution with tICH that received APT during their initial hospitalization over a three-year period. We reviewed their demographics, hospital course, clinical indication and timing for initiation of APT, and complications. Results: A total of 222 patients were identified. The median age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 61 and 21, respectively. Fifty (23%) patients required neurosurgical procedures. APTs were initiated due to a history of APT use in 91 patients (41%) and blunt cerebrovascular injury in 86 patients (38.6%). The median time from injury to starting APT was 4 days. Immediate complications including new or worsening hemorrhage occurred in 1 (<1%) patient. Delayed hemorrhagic complications occurred in 6 (4.7%) patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 21 (9.4%) patients prior to starting APT. Thirteen (5.8%) of these were potentially preventable. Conclusion: The risk of immediate and delayed intracranial hemorrhages from initiating APT after tICH must be weighed against the morbidity of delaying indicated thrombotic prophylaxis. Our initial data indicates that hemorrhagic complications are infrequent, and thrombotic complications can have significant clinical consequences. Our retrospective review provides the first rates of complications for this patient population. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据