4.2 Article

Domestic host availability modifies human-triatomine contact and host shifts of the Chagas disease vectorTriatoma infestansin the humid Argentine Chaco

期刊

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 459-469

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12463

关键词

Vector control; feeding choices; host-selection patterns; nutritional status; dilution effect; allometry

资金

  1. International Development Research Center (Canada)
  2. Tropical Disease Research (UNICEF/PNUD/WB/WHO) [A70596]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnica of Argentina [PICT-2011-2072, PICT-2015-2921]
  4. University of Buenos Aires

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Domestic animals may affect human-vector contact and parasite transmission rates. We investigated the relationships between host-feeding choices, site-specific host availability, bug nutritional status, stage and abundance ofTriatoma infestansKlug (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) in rural houses of Pampa del Indio during spring. We identified the bloodmeal sources of 865 triatomines collected in 70 sites from four main ecotopes. The main sources in domiciles were human (65.9%), chicken (23.4%) and dog (22.4%); dog (64.4%, 35.3%) and chicken (33.1%, 75.4%) in kitchens and storerooms, respectively; and chicken (94.7%) in chicken coops. Using random-intercept logistic regression clustered by domicile, the fraction of human-fed triatomines strongly decreased with increasing proportions of chicken- and dog-fed bugs, dropping from 96.4% when no chicken or dog slept indoors at night to 59.4% when both did. The fraction of dog-fed bugs significantly decreased with increasing human and chicken blood indices, and marginally increased with an indoor-resting dog. Mixed blood meals occurred 3.62 times more often when a chicken or a dog slept indoors. Host blood source did not affect mean body weight adjusted for body length and bug stage. Indoor-resting chickens and dogs greatly modified human-bug contact rates, and may be targeted with long-lasting systemic insecticides to suppress infestation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据