4.7 Article

Physical synthesis method for global reliability analysis of engineering structures

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106652

关键词

Randomness propagation; Global reliability; Physical synthesis; Multiple failure criteria; Probabilistic dissipative system; Probability density evolution method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51538010, 51908224]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2018M640783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global reliability analysis is quite essential for safety design and serviceability maintenance of modern engineering structures. Various reliability analysis methods have been proposed though, the issues of combination explosion as well as probabilistic correlation of system failure paths remain challenging. Practical applications of these methods are thus hindered, especially when complex, implicit, and nonlinear performance functions are involved. There isn't an efficient way out of this dilemma until the emergence of the probability density evolution method (PDEM) combined with the equivalent extreme value event principle in recent years. The governing partial differential equations regarding the probability density evolution of a stochastic dynamical system are decoupled to a one-dimensional generalized probability density evolution equation (GPDEE) by employing the random event description. In conjunction with the PDEM, this paper explores a physical synthesis approach towards the global reliability analysis of actual engineering structures. Evaluation of multiple failure potential is incorporated into the mathematical resolving of the GPDEE for structural response at a representative point. An accurate and efficient solving procedure for the global reliability of probabilistic dissipative systems is presented where no need of seeking the failure paths and their associated probabilities. Numerical applications are examined to illustrate the use of the physical synthesis method as a practical analysis tool. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据