4.7 Article

Clonal complex 398 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 451-455

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.018

关键词

Case-control study; CC398; human ST398; mortality; MSSA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the last decade, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus belonging to clonal complex 398 (CC398) has become a worldwide threat associated with livestock. More recently, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) belonging to CC398 have been increasingly reported as a cause of invasive infections in patients without livestock contact. We investigated risk factors associated with CC398 bloodstream infections (BSIs) compared with non-CC398 BSIs with a case-control study in a French university Hospital. From January 2010 to December 2014, nonduplicate Staphylococcus aureus (SA) isolates responsible for BSIs in adult patient were typed to identify those belonging to CC398. Each adult patient with a CC398 SA BSI (cases) was matched with 2 non-CC398 SA BSI controls randomly selected on the basis of the time at risk, the unit of hospitalization and susceptibility to methicillin. We retrospectively extracted the clinical information from electronic medical records and used conditional logistic regression for univariate and multivariate analyses. We identified 67 CC398 isolates among the 770 SA responsible for BSI in adult patients. All CC398 isolates were susceptible to methicillin. The proportion of CC398 among MSSA increased steadily from 4.6% in 2010 to 15.1% in 2013 and then stabilized at 13.8% in 2014. Factors significantly associated with CC398 MSSA BSIs were healthcare-associated infection (odds ratio (OR) 3.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-7.63), history of neurologic disease (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.13-5.65) and 30-day mortality (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.23-4.85). (C) 2016 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据