4.7 Article

Beetroot and radish powders as natural nitrite source for fermented dry sausages

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108275

关键词

Natural cure; Clean label; Healthier fermented sausage; Lipid oxidation; Dried vegetables

资金

  1. Brazilian Federal Agency for the Improvement of Higher Education (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil [CAPES]) [001]
  2. CYTED [119RT0568]
  3. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Spain) Juan de la Cierva program [FJCI-2016-29486]
  4. GAIN (Axencia Galega de Innovacion) [IN607A2019/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the use of radish and beetroot powders as potential substitutes for nitrite in fermented dry sausages, with beetroot powder showing promise as a feasible nitrite replacer. The addition of vegetable powders influenced various characteristics of the sausages, and nitrite was formed from radish and beetroot powders during the ripening process.
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of radish and beetroot powders as potential substitutes of nitrite in fermented dry sausages due to their high nitrate content (around 16,000 and 14,000 mg/kg, respectively). Six treatments were prepared and evaluated during the ripening process and storage time: C1 (control with 150 mg/kg sodium nitrite and 150 mg/kg sodium nitrate), C2 (control without sodium nitrite/nitrate), R05 (0.5% radish powder), R1 (1% radish powder), B05 (0.5% beetroot powder) and B1 (1% beetroot powder). The addition of vegetable powders influenced moisture content, weight loss and water activity of sausages. Nitrite was formed from radish and beetroot powders during the ripening process, especially in R1 and B1 treatments. Beetroot powder affected colour, pigments and lactic acid bacteria counts. The results of pH, colour, lipid oxidation, nitrite and nitrate analysis suggest R1 treatment as a potential nitrite replacer obtained from a simple and feasible drying process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据