4.2 Article

CHOP Chemotherapy Followed by Tositumomab and Iodine-131 Tositumomab for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

期刊

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 191-196

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.12.011

关键词

Bexxar; Consolidation therapy; DLBCL; Radioimmunotherapy

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma requiring more effective first-line therapies. We evaluated tositumomab/iodine-131 tositumomab (TST/I-131 TST) in 15 DLBCL patients who responded to first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). CHOP and TST/I-131 TST increased the complete response rate from 60% post-CHOP to 80%, with 58.4 months median duration of response with no unexpected safety events. The efficacy and safety of tositumomab/iodine-131 tositumomab (TST/I-131 TST) were evaluated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients who responded to first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). Fifteen patients (median age, 52 years) received dosimetric and therapeutic doses of TST/I-131 TST. The most common Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were decreased absolute neutrophil count (47%), white blood cell count (40%), platelet count (27%), and hemoglobin (20%). The complete response (CR) rate increased from 60% post-CHOP to 80% post TST /I-131 TST. With a median follow-up of 120.0 months (range, 14-130 months), median duration of response (95% confidence intervals) was 58.4 months (12.0-not reached [NR]) for patients with confirmed complete response and 58.4 months (20.9-NR) for all confirmed responders. Median progression-free survival and time to treatment failure were 63.0 months (16.1-NR). Median overall survival was not reached; 2 patients died on study. CHOP and TST/I-131 TST demonstrated clinical activity with acceptable toxicity. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据