4.3 Article

Lubrication and drug release behaviors of mesoporous silica nanoparticles grafted with sulfobetaine-based zwitterionic polymer

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110886

关键词

Zwitterionic polyelectrolyte; Lubrication; Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Drug delivery; Osteoarthritis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675296]
  2. Tsinghua University-Peking Union Medical College Hospital Initiative Scientific Research Program [20191080593]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20197050026, 202-276-132-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis, which is characterized by irreversible destruction of articular cartilage and severe inflammation of joint capsule, may be effectively treated via the synergistic therapy of lubrication restoration and local drug intervention. In this study, zwitterionic polymer-grafted mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs@pSBMA) with the property of enhanced lubrication and sustained drug release were successfully synthesized via photopolymerization of 3-[dimethyl-[2-(2-methylprop-2-enoyloxy) ethyl] azaniumyl] propane-1-sulfonate polymer (pSBMA) on the surface of MSNs. The tribiological test showed that the lubrication performance of MSNs@pSBMA was remarkably improved, with a reduction of 80% in friction coefficient compared with MSNs. It was attributed to hydration lubrication mechanism by which a tenacious hydration layer was formed surrounding the N+(CH2)(2)(CH3)(2) and SO3- headgroups in the pSBMA polyelectrolyte polymer. Additionally, the surface morphology analysis of the tribopairs demonstrated that MSNs@pSBMA were endowed with excellent anti-wear performance. Importantly, the drug release test illustrated that, compared with MSNs, MSNs@pSBMA achieved good sustained drug release behavior. In summary, the MSNs@pSBMA nanoparticles developed herein, as an injectable lubricant with enhanced lubrication and drug delivery, may represent a promising approach for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据