4.2 Article

Assessing the spatiotemporal persistence of fish distributions: a case study on two red mullet species (Mullus surmuletus and M. barbatus) in the western Mediterranean

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 644, 期 -, 页码 173-185

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps13366

关键词

Fisheries management; Fisheries-restricted areas; Marine spatial planning; Spatiotemporal; Species distribution modelling

资金

  1. EU through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)
  2. Fundacion Biodiversidad (Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and the Environment)
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y UniversidadesAgencia Estatal de Investigacion (European Regional Development Fund, FEDER) [MTM201677501-P, TEC2016-81900-REDT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the spatiotemporal persistence of fish distributions is key to defining fish hotspots and effective fisheries-restricted areas (FRAs). Hierarchical Bayesian spatiotemporal models provide an excellent framework to understand these distributions, as they can accommodate different spatiotemporal behaviour in the data, primarily due to their flexibility. The aim of this research was to characterize the fundamental behavioural patterns of fish as persistent, opportunistic or progressive by comparing different spatiotemporal model structures in order to provide better information for marine spatial planning. To illustrate this method, the spatiotemporal distributions of 2 sympatric Mullidae species, the striped red mullet Mullus surmuletus and the red mullet M. barbatus, were analysed. The occurrence of each species, its conditional-to-presence abundance and median length were analysed using Mediterranean trawl survey data from the western Mediterranean between 2000 and 2016. Results demonstrate that there are various common hotspots of both species distributed along the Iberian coast. The convenient persistent spatiotemporal distribution of these hotspots facilitates the configuration of a network of connected FRAs for red mullets in the study area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据