4.7 Article

An efficient ultrasound-assisted extraction method of pea protein and its effect on protein functional properties and biological activities

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109348

关键词

Pea protein isolates; Process optimization; Protein structure; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160493]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571691]
  3. Senior Talent Scientific Research Initial Funding Project of Jiangsu University [15JDG17, 15JDG061]
  4. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program of China
  5. Excellent Key Young Teachers Project of Jiangsu University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasound-assisted alkali method was developed to obtain high extraction level of pea protein isolate (PPI). The method parameters of ultrasound-assisted alkali extraction were successfully optimized using response surface methodology. The highest extraction level of PPI reached 82.6% at a solid/liquid ratio of 1:11.5 g:mL, pH 9.6, 13.5 min extraction time and 33.7% ultrasonic amplitude. Ultrasound caused changes to the secondary and tertiary protein structure of PPI, resulting in partial protein unfolding and the exposure of hydrophobic groups. In addition, smaller particle size and better dispersion were obtained in PPI with ultrasound-assisted extraction. The ultrasound-assisted alkali method resulted in significant improvements in the functional properties of PPIs, including increased solubility, water/oil holding capacity, foaming/emulsifying capacity, stability, and gel formation capacity. The biological activities of PPIs were also enhanced. Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity was doubled, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity was increased by 55.1% compared with those of PPI extracted using traditional method. This study provides a potential strategy for the production of pea protein with high efficiency and high quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据