4.7 Article

UPLC-DAD-QToF/MS analysis of green tea phenolic metabolites in their free, esterified, glycosylated, and cell wall-bound forms by ultra-sonication, agitation, and conventional extraction techniques

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109440

关键词

Green tea infusions; Free phenolics; Soluble esterified phenolics; Soluble glycosylated phenolics; Cell wall-bound phenolics

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01256503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, phenolic metabolites in their free, soluble esterified, and soluble glycosylated forms in green tea infusions and cell wall-bound forms in solid residues obtained by ultrasound treatment, agitation treatment, and normal infusion preparation method were investigated. In total, thirty-three phenolic compounds were characterized including twenty-two flavonoids and eleven phenolic acids using UPLC-DAD-QToF/MS analysis. The flavonoids were sub-characterized as flavanols and flavonols, and phenolic acids were sub-characterized as hydroxybenzoic acid, hydroxybenzoylquinic acid, hydroxycinnamic acid, and hydroxycinnamoylquinic acid. As flavanols, EGCG was dominant in their free form and was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in ultrasound (4094 mg/100 g) and agitation (3906 mg/100 g) treatment than normal infusion (1657 mg/100 g). Kaempferol was predominant flavonols in their free form and was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in ultrasound (54.78 mg/100 g) and agitation (53.87 mg/100 g) treatment than normal infusion (30.67 mg/100 g). In contrary, cell wall-bound phenolics were dominated by gallic acid and were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in normal solid residues (2582 mg/100 g) than agitation (527 mg/100 g) and ultrasound (157 mg/100 g) treatment. This study provides a useful database of different forms of phenolic metabolite profiling of aqueous green tea infusions and solid residues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据