4.1 Article

Field storage of water samples affects measured environmental DNA concentration and detection

期刊

LIMNOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 1-4

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10201-020-00634-y

关键词

Corbicula; Sample handling; eDNA; DNA degradation; Asian clam

资金

  1. Francis M. and Harlie M. Clark Research Grant
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project [1008988]
  3. NIFA [1008988, 913074] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that water samples kept in the dark and chilled did not show a significant decrease in eDNA detection or concentration compared to samples filtered immediately, while samples exposed to light and ambient air temperature showed rapid degradation of eDNA. This has important implications for fieldwork without immediate refrigeration and highlights the need for further research on eDNA degradation mechanisms and sample storage.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) is an emerging approach for detecting species, yet numerous methodological questions remain unanswered. Here we examined how time to filtration (0-48 h after collection) and sample storage (open vs. chilled in the dark) influenced detection and measured eDNA concentration. Water samples kept in the dark and chilled had no significant decrease in detection or eDNA concentration relative to those filtered immediately upon return from the field. Water samples exposed to light and ambient air temperature had non-detections beginning at 1 h, the majority of these samples were below the limit of detection (LOD) by 6 h, and eDNA was undetectable in these samples by 24 h. These results have important implications for eDNA research where immediate access to refrigeration is not available, or for fieldwork that requires extended sampling time (e.g., canoeing a river). Further, we report faster eDNA degradation times under ambient conditions than some previous aquaria or mesocosm studies, suggesting an ongoing need to study mechanisms related to eDNA persistence and sample storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据