4.7 Article

KMUP-1 regulates the vascular calcification in chronic renal failure by mediating NO/cGMP/PKG signaling pathway

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117683

关键词

KMUP-1; Chronic renal failure; Vascular calcification; Pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the potential mechanism of KMUP-1 in the vascular calcification of chronic renal failure (CRF) through mediating NO/cGMP/PKG pathway, and provide novel insights into the CRF treatment. Methods: CRF rats were treated by KMUP-1 with/without L-NNA (a NOS inhibitor) and then performed by ELISA, alizarin red staining, Von Kossa staining, Masson's trichrome, Sirius red staining and CD3 immunohistochemical staining. Simultaneously, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were collected from rats to confirm the effect of KMUP-1 on vascular calcification in vitro via NO/cGMP/PKG pathway. Besides, protein and mRNA expressions were determined via Western blotting and qRT-PCR, respectively. Results: CRF rats were elevated in 24-h urine protein, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, Cys-C levels and inflammatory cytokines. Besides, CRF rats also showed increased calcium content and ALP level with up-regulated mRNA of osteogenic differentiation-related markers. Furthermore, the up-regulated expressions of eNOS and PKG, as well as down-regulated levels of NOx and cGMP were also found in CRF rats. However, renal failure and vascular calcification of CRF were improved significantly by KMUP-1 treatment via activation of NO/cGMP/PKG pathway. Moreover, KMUP-1 treatment attenuated calcified VSMCs, accompanied by the decreases in the calcified nodules, level of calcium and activity of ALP. In addition, either L-NNA treatment for CRF rats or the calcified VSMCs could antagonize the improving effect of KMUP-1. Conclusion: KMUP-1 can improve the renal function and vascular calcification in CRF rats at least in part by activating NO/cGMP/PKG pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据