4.7 Article

Executive summary of the 2020 KDIGO Diabetes Management in CKD Guideline: evidence-based advances in monitoring and treatment

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 839-848

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.024

关键词

angiotensin-convering enzyme inhibitor; angiotensin II receptor blocker; chronic kidney disease; dialysis; evidence-based; GLP-1 receptor agonist; glycemia; glycemic monitoring; glycemic targets; guideline; HbA1c; hemodialysis; KDIGO; lifestyle; metformin; models of care; nutrition; renin-angiotensin system; self-management; SGLT2 inhibitor; systematic review; team-based care

资金

  1. KDIGO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease represents the first KDIGO guideline on this subject. The guideline comes at a time when advances in diabetes technology and therapeutics offer new options to manage the large population of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of poor health outcomes. An enlarging base of high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials is available to evaluate important new treatments offering organ protection, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The goal of the new guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize the clinical care of people with diabetes and CKD by integrating new options with existing management strategies. In addition, the guideline contains practice points to facilitate implementation when insufficient data are available to make well-justified recommendations or when additional guidance may be useful for clinical application. The guideline covers comprehensive care of patients with diabetes and CKD, glycemic monitoring and targets, lifestyle interventions, antihyperglycemic therapies, and self-management and health systems approaches to management of patients with diabetes and CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据