4.7 Article

Applicability of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Viral Load Thresholds for 8-Week Treatments in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 1228-1234

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw061

关键词

hepatitis C virus; HCV RNA assay; baseline viral load; Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan; Abbott RealTime HCV

资金

  1. Abbott
  2. AbbVie
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Covidien
  5. Gilead
  6. Janssen-Cilag
  7. Merck/Merck Sharp Dohme (MSD)
  8. Roche
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck
  11. Theravance
  12. Merck/MSD
  13. Boehringer
  14. Novartin
  15. Novartis
  16. Tibotec
  17. Vertex
  18. Qiagen
  19. Siemens
  20. Achillion
  21. Fujirebio
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Transgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection may be shortened to 8 weeks in treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients with baseline HCV RNA levels of <4 or <6 million (M) IU/mL based on post-hoc analyses of phase 3 trial data. The applicability of these viral load thresholds in clinical practice is unknown. Methods. Pretreatment and on-treatment serum samples (n = 740) from patients with HCV genotype 1 infection were included for HCV RNA analysis with 2 widely used assays, Cobas AmpliPrep/CobasTaqMan (CAP/CTM) and Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assays. Results. HCV RNA levels were significantly higher with CAP/CTM than with ART (overall difference, +0.11 log(10) IU/mL; P < .001). In treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, discordance rates around the clinical cutoffs at 4M and 6M IU/mL were 23% and 18%, respectively. The mean differences between assays in discordant samples were 0.38 (4M) and 0.41 (6M) log(10) IU/mL, respectively. Overall, 87% and 95% of treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, respectively, had baseline HCV RNA levels below 4M and 6M IU/mL with ART. These rates were significantly higher than those measured with CAP/CTM (64% and 78%, respectively; P < .001). Finally, discordance rates around the proposed thresholds in 2 consecutive samples of the same patient were in the range of 1%-2% for ART and 13%-17% for CAP/CTM. Conclusions. Selection of patients for 8-week regimens on the basis of a single HCV RNA determination may not be reliable because viral load levels around the proposed clinical thresholds show significant interassay and intrapatient variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据