4.8 Article

Design Principles for Enhancing Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in Hybrid Manganese Bromides

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 31, 页码 13582-13589

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c06039

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [SC0012541]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council
  4. MOE of Singapore for Tier 1 at NUS [R284-000-193-114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid manganese halides have attracted widespread attention because of their highly emissive optical properties. To understand the underlying structural factors that dictate the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of these materials, we report five new hybrid manganese bromides with the general formula A(m)MnBr(4) [m = 1 or 2, A = dimethylammonium (DMA), 3-methylpiperidinium (3MP), 3-aminomethylpiperidinium (3AMP), heptamethylenimine (HEP), and trimethylphenylammonium (TMPEA)]. By studying the crystal structures and optical properties of these materials and combining our results with the findings from previously reported analogs, we have found a direct correlation between Mn center dot center dot center dot Mn distance and the PLQY, where high PLQYs are associated with long Mn center dot center dot center dot Mn distances. This effect can be viewed as a manifestation of the concentration-quenching effect, except these are in stoichiometric compounds with precise interatomic distances rather than random alloys. To gain better separation of the Mn centers and prevent energy transfer, a bulky singly protonated cation that avoids H-bonding is ideal. We have demonstrated this principle in one of our newly reported material, (TMPEA)(2)MnBr4, where a PLQY of 70.8% for a powder sample and 98% for a large single crystal sample is achieved. Our study reveals a generalized method for improving PLQYs in hybrid manganese bromides and is readily extended to designing all varieties of highly emissive hybrid materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据