4.5 Article

A new and fast rival genetic algorithm for feature selection

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING
卷 77, 期 3, 页码 2844-2874

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-020-03378-9

关键词

Feature selection; Genetic algorithm; Wrapper approach; Classification; Competition strategy; Binary optimization

资金

  1. Skim Zamalah UTeM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feature selection is a crucial step in classification tasks, with the proposed rival genetic algorithm and its fast version enhancing the performance of genetic algorithm in feature selection by utilizing a competition strategy and dynamic mutation rate to improve the global search capability, achieving highly competitive results compared to other algorithms.
Feature selection is one of the significant steps in classification tasks. It is a pre-processing step to select a small subset of significant features that can contribute the most to the classification process. Presently, many metaheuristic optimization algorithms were successfully applied for feature selection. The genetic algorithm (GA) as a fundamental optimization tool has been widely used in feature selection tasks. However, GA suffers from the hyperparameter setting, high computational complexity, and the randomness of selection operation. Therefore, we propose a new rival genetic algorithm, as well as a fast version of rival genetic algorithm, to enhance the performance of GA in feature selection. The proposed approaches utilize the competition strategy that combines the new selection and crossover schemes, which aim to improve the global search capability. Moreover, a dynamic mutation rate is proposed to enhance the search behaviour of the algorithm in the mutation process. The proposed approaches are validated on 23 benchmark datasets collected from the UCI machine learning repository and Arizona State University. In comparison with other competitors, proposed approach can provide highly competing results and overtake other algorithms in feature selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据