4.4 Article

IDE-MLSSVR-Based Back Analysis Method for Multiple Mechanical Parameters of Concrete Dams

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 146, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002602

关键词

Back analysis; Multioutput least-squares support vector regression machine (MLSSVR); Differential evolution algorithm (DE); Concrete dam; Safety monitoring

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1508603, 2016YFC0401601]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018B623X14]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51579086, 51739003]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0592]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A back analysis method based on multioutput least-squares support vector regression machine (MLSSVR) and improved differential evolution algorithm (IDE) is proposed to estimate multiple mechanical parameters of concrete dams. Based on the uniform design method, representative combinations of mechanical parameters are generated. Using these combinations, calculated hydrostatic displacement component differences are obtained through the finite-element method (FEM). The calculated hydrostatic component differences and mechanical parameters are then used to train MLSSVR models, with the model parameters selected by IDE. This allows for establishing the mapping relationship between dam displacements and corresponding mechanical parameters. The hydrostatic component differences separated from prototype observed data are then substituted into the model to obtain back analyzed mechanical parameters. If predefined terminating conditions are not satisfied, new combinations are added to the training set, and the training process continues until satisfied. The proposed back analysis method was successfully implemented to the Jinping I arch dam. Results indicate that the proposed method has high precision and strong generation ability. (c) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据