4.4 Article

Electric Circuit Induced by Quantum Walk

期刊

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS
卷 181, 期 2, 页码 603-617

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-020-02591-3

关键词

Quantum walk; Scattering; Electric circuit; Reversibility

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19K03616, 25400208, 18K03401, 15H02055]
  2. Research Origin for Dressed Photon
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H02055, 18K03401, 19K03616] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider the Szegedy walk on graphs adding infinite length tails to a finite internal graph. We assume that on these tails, the dynamics is given by the free quantum walk. We set the l(infinity)-category initial state so that the internal graph receives time independent input from the tails, say alpha(in), at every time step. We show that the response of the Szegedy walk to the input, which is the output, say beta(out), from the internal graph to the tails in the long time limit, is drastically changed depending on the reversibility of the underlying random walk. If the underlying random walk is reversible, we have beta(out) = Sz(m(delta E))alpha(in), where the unitary matrix Sz(m(delta E)) is the reflection matrix to the unit vector m(delta E) which is determined by the boundary of the internal graph delta E. Then the global dynamics so that the internal graph is regarded as one vertex recovers the local dynamics of the Szegedy walk in the long time limit. Moreover if the underlying random walk of the Szegedy walk is reversible, then we obtain that the stationary state is expressed by a linear combination of the reversible measure and the electric current on the electric circuit determined by the internal graph and the random walk's reversible measure. On the other hand, if the underlying random walk is not reversible, then the unitary matrix is just a phase flip; that is, beta(out) = -alpha(in), and the stationary state is similar to the current flow but satisfies a different type of the Kirchhoff laws.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据