4.6 Article

Did injury incidence in alpine ski racing change after equipment regulations? An evaluation based on the injury surveillance system of the Austrian Ski Federation

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 1044-1048

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.005

关键词

Skiing; Severe injuries; Knee; Anterior cruciate ligament; Equipment changes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The alpine competition equipment regulations implemented in 2003 did not lead to a noticeable reduction in severe injury incidence. In fact, the majority of cases showed an increase in injury rates, with only a minority showing a decrease.
Objectives: To assess the effects of alpine competition equipment regulations from 2003, 2007 and 2012 on severe injury incidence. Design: Case study Method: Data originated from records of the injury surveillance system of the Austrian Ski Federation. Injuries from the seasons 2001-2017 were divided in four periods between the equipment regulations. For comparison of consecutive periods, risk ratios (RR = later period / preceding period) with 95% CI were calculated. Total severe injury events, events with severe knee injuries, and events with severe ACL injuries were separately investigated. Results: A significant increase of total severe injury incidence was found after the equipment regulation in 2003 (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.00-2.31). None of the other comparisons revealed significance (p < 0.05) or statistical trends (p < 0.1). Only the minority (40%) of the RR showed a reduction in the injury incidence of the Austrian Ski Team (lowest RR 0.78). 60% of the RR increased after the regulations (highest RR 1.63). Conclusions: Even though statistical uncertainties remain, our findings allow the conclusion, that the implemented equipment regulations did not cause a noticeable reduction of injuries. The three analysed equipment regulations were not appropriate or were counteracted by other factors. (c) 2020 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据