4.4 Article

Concordance between peripheral and decidual NK cell subsets and killer immunoglobulin-like receptors in women with recurrent spontaneous miscarriages

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103130

关键词

RSM; Miscarriage; NK; KIR; decidua

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Grant Office, Assiut University [2016/08/03-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The role of decidual natural killer (dNK) cells in normal and complicated pregnancy and their relation with peripheral NK (pNK) cells remains unclear. The study aim was phenotypic analysis of pNK and dNK cells at time of miscarriage in recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (RSM) patients to assess whether measuring levels of pNK cell populations can reflect changes in dNK cells or not. Methods: This study included 40 middle aged pregnant women in the 1st trimester subjected to evacuation because of a current miscarriage. They had a history of previous >= two unexplained miscarriages. Frequencies of pNK and dNK cells, based on the expression of CD56, CD16, inhibitory (CD158b) and activating (CD161) Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs), were detected by flow cytometry. Results: Percentages of CD56(+) NK cells in peripheral blood and decidua were 17.5 % and 17.3 %, respectively. In both blood and decidua, CD56(dim) NK cells were exceeding CD56(bri)(g)(ht) NK cells. The CD56(dim) CD16(-) NK cells were the predominating subset of NK cells, followed by CD56(dim) CD16(dim). No substantial differences were detected in the levels of KIRs expression by the different NK subsets between blood and decidua. Abnormal upregulation of both CD161 and CD158b on NK cells was observed in blood and decidua. Conclusion: At the time of miscarriage, patients with RSM have an extremely active immune system and an increased number of toxic NK cells both in blood and decidua. The pNK cells reflect dNK cell changes during miscarriage and may be a useful non-invasive predicting tool in reproductive failure setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据