4.5 Article

Mechanical characterisation of a bamboo fibre/polylactic acid composite produced by fused deposition modelling

期刊

JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES
卷 39, 期 23-24, 页码 932-944

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0731684420938434

关键词

Bamboo fibres; natural fibres; composite materials; additive manufacturing; Taguchi design

资金

  1. Fondo Institucional de Fomento Regional para el Desarrollo Cientifico, Tecnologico y de Innovacion (FORDECyT) of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) through the project: Fortalecimiento Aeronautico del Noroeste de Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer matrices are usually reinforced with fibres giving a good strength/weight ratio. Currently, innovative research has been focussed in producing new composite materials using natural fibres as an alternative sustainable material. In the present work, the mechanical behaviour of a composite based on polylactic acid reinforced with bamboo fibre produced by additive manufacturing was evaluated. Specimens were manufactured using fused deposition modelling with different geometry depositions, layer thicknesses and fill densities. The results were evaluated performing an analysis of variance with a confidence level of 95%. The composites were subjected to mechanical testing to evaluate the influence of process parameters in tensile strength, strain, and elastic modulus. It was observed that the principal factors that influence the elasticity are the deposition geometry and fill density. Fracture zones and manufacturing defects were additionally studied using optical and scanning electron microscopy. The vertical orientation of the layers causes the premature rupture of the test samples due to the tension being reverted at the interface between the layers. The specimens showed slight adhesion between the polylactic acid matrix and the bamboo fibres. This effect was related with the presence of porosity, cracks and local deformations in the composite material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据