4.7 Review

Proteomics and Informatics for Understanding Phases and Identifying Biomarkers in COVID-19 Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 4219-4232

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00326

关键词

assay; biomarker; marker; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; proteomics; diagnosis; prognosis; artificial intelligence

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/M008959/1]
  2. CRUK Manchester Centre award [C5759/A25254]
  3. Bloodwise [19007]
  4. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  5. MRC [MR/M008959/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, has necessitated the urgent development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Rapid research and development, on an international scale, has already generated assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA and host immunoglobulins. However, the complexities of COVID-19 are such that fuller definitions of patient status, trajectory, sequelae, and responses to therapy are now required. There is accumulating evidence-from studies of both COVID-19 and the related disease SARS-that protein biomarkers could help to provide this definition. Proteins associated with blood coagulation (D-dimer), cell damage (lactate dehydrogenase), and the inflammatory response (e.g., C-reactive protein) have already been identified as possible predictors of COVID-19 severity or mortality. Proteomics technologies, with their ability to detect many proteins per analysis, have begun to extend these early findings. To be effective, proteomics strategies must include not only methods for comprehensive data acquisition (e.g., using mass spectrometry) but also informatics approaches via which to derive actionable information from large data sets. Here we review applications of proteomics to COVID-19 and SARS and outline how pipelines involving technologies such as artificial intelligence could be of value for research on these diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据