4.8 Article

Improved water management by alternating air flow directions in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 466, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228311

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Water management; Self-humidification; Alternating air flow directions; Voltage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776095]
  2. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201804020048, 201805010001]
  3. Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province [2019B090909001]
  4. Guangdong Science and Technology Project [2016B090927009]
  5. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Technology [2008A060301002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the water management improvement of a water-cooled proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack with alternating air flow directions. This method only needs to add two three-way solenoid valves and several pipelines to the original system. The effects of different alternating modes, different alternating intervals and different hydrogen purge periods on the stack performance are experimentally studied. The advantages and disadvantages of the scheme have also been discussed in detail. Experimental results confirm that the method can significantly increase the stack voltage. When the operating temperature is 65 degrees C and the current density is 0.8 A/cm(2), the stack voltage can be improved by 19.46%. Alternating air flow directions causes a redistribution of the water inside the stack. This can make the water distribution more uniform and achieve self-humidification. The proposed solution can also increase air pressure. However, alternating air flow directions will make the stack voltage fluctuate significantly. The alternating interval should be a trade-off between the fluctuation amplitude and the fluctuation frequency. The amplitude of the stack voltage fluctuation cannot be reduced by adjusting the purge period. This research provides a new reference for the water management improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据