4.3 Article

Diagnosing collisionless energy transfer using field-particle correlations: Alfven-ion cyclotron turbulence

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022377820000689

关键词

plasma nonlinear phenomena; space plasma physics; plasma simulation

资金

  1. NASA [80NSSC19K1390, 80NSSC19K0912, HSR 80NSSC18K1217, HGI 80NSSC18K0643, MMSGI 80NSSC18K1371]
  2. NSF SHINE award [AGS-1622306]
  3. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana [ASI-INAF 2015-0390R.O]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We apply field-particle correlations - a technique that tracks the time-averaged velocity-space structure of the energy density transfer rate between electromagnetic fields and plasma particles - to data drawn from a hybrid Vlasov-Maxwell simulation of Alfven-ion cyclotron turbulence. Energy transfer in this system is expected to include both Landau and cyclotron wave-particle resonances, unlike previous systems to which the field-particle correlation technique has been applied. In this simulation, the energy transfer rate mediated by the parallel electric field E-parallel to comprises approximately 60% of the total rate, with the remainder mediated by the perpendicular electric field E-perpendicular to. The parallel electric field resonantly couples to protons, with the canonical bipolar velocity-space signature of Landau damping identified at many points throughout the simulation. The energy transfer mediated by E-perpendicular to preferentially couples to particles with v(tp) less than or similar to v(perpendicular to) less than or similar to 3 v(tp), where vtp is the proton thermal speed, in agreement with the expected formation of a cyclotron diffusion plateau. Our results demonstrate clearly that the field-particle correlation technique can distinguish distinct channels of energy transfer using single-point measurements, even at points in which multiple channels act simultaneously, and can be used to determine quantitatively the rates of particle energization in each channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据