4.5 Article

Resolving Heterogeneous Dynamics of Excess Protons in Aqueous Solution with Rate Theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 124, 期 27, 页码 5665-5675

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02649

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences
  2. MS3 (Materials Synthesis and Simulation Across Scales) Initiative, a Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1652960]
  4. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rate theories have found great utility across the chemical sciences by providing a physically transparent way to analyze dynamical processes. Here we demonstrate the benefits of using transition state theory and Marcus theory to study the rate of proton transfer in HCl solutions. By using long ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we show that good agreement is obtained between these two different formulations of rate theory and how they can be used to study the pathways and lifetime of proton transfer in aqueous solution. Since both rate theory formulations utilize identical sets of molecular data, this provides a self-consistent theoretical picture of the rates of aqueous phase proton transfer. Specifically, we isolate and quantify the rates of proton transfer, ion-pair dissociation, and solvent exchange in concentrated HCl solutions. Our analysis predicts a concentration dependence to both proton transfer and ion-pairing. Moreover, our estimate of the lifetime for the Zundel species is 0.8 and 1.3 ps for 2 M and 8 M HCl, respectively. We demonstrate that concentration effects can indeed be quantified through the combination of state-of-the-art simulation and theory and provides a picture of the important correlations between the cation (hydronium) and the counterion in acid solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据