4.6 Article

Application of untargeted lipidomics based on UHPLC-high resolution tandem MS analysis to profile the lipid metabolic disturbances in the heart of diabetic cardiomyopathy mice

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113525

关键词

Lipidomics; diabetic cardiomyopathy; lipid accumulation; lipotoxicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803795]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20180823]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [18KJB360003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a distinct form of heart disease caused by diabetes. Lipid accumulation has been reported to present in the hearts of DCM animals, however characterization of disordered lipids, and their roles in the etiology and progress of DCM remain largely undefined. In present study, an untargeted lipidomics based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometers was established for global detection of lipids in the hearts of DCM mice. DCM mice showed significant cardiac dysfunction with decreased left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) and ratio of peak early filling velocity to atrial filling velocity (MV E/A). Histological lesion, fibrosis, hypertrophy, and lipid accumulation were also observed in the heart of DCM mice. By lipidomics analysis, a total of 244 lipids were identified, of which 89 lipids were significantly changed. The disordered metabolic profile of lipids in DCM mice heart were characterized by the accumulation of triacylglycerol, glycerophospholipid, cholesterol-sulfate, ceramide and sphingomyelin, as well as by the loss of glycerophospholipid. The lipid alterations in the heart were correlated with the development of cardiac dysfunction, lipotoxicity, inflammation and insulin resistance. Correlations between lipid metabolism disorders and DCM progress should be further explored. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据