4.5 Article

A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 331-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.026

关键词

Early palliative care; advanced cancer patients; end-of-life discussions; question prompt list; communication

资金

  1. Institut National du Cancer INCA (grant Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) [20100728]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that using a question prompt list (QPL) in advance care planning can increase the number of questions raised by advanced cancer patients in outpatient palliative care consultations, particularly on palliative care and end-of-life issues. Additionally, patients using the QPL expressed higher satisfaction with doctors' technical skills and had less frequent avoidance coping responses.
Context. Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care. Objectives. This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations. Methods. In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months. Results. Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P= 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm. Conclusion. Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据