4.7 Article

Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) PET/MRI of Prostate Cancer for Noninvasive Evaluation of Aggressiveness: Comparison with Gleason Score in a Prospective Phase 2 Clinical Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 354-359

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.248120

关键词

urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor; prostate cancer; PET/MRI; risk stratification; active surveillance; Gleason score

资金

  1. European Union [670261, 668532]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  4. Innovation Fund Denmark
  5. Danish Cancer Society
  6. Arvid Nilsson Foundation
  7. Svend Andersen Foundation
  8. Neye Foundation
  9. Research Foundation of Rigshospitalet
  10. Danish National Research Foundation [126]
  11. Research Council of the Capital Region of Denmark
  12. Danish Health Authority
  13. John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
  14. Research Council for Independent Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to evaluate the correlation between uptake of the PET ligand Ga-68-NOTA-AE105 and Gleason score in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Results showed a significant positive correlation between SUVmax and Gleason score. SUVmax could discriminate between low-risk Gleason score profiles and intermediate risk Gleason score profiles accurately.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between uptake of the PET ligand Ga-68-NOTA-AE105, targeting the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and Gleason score in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Methods: Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) or previously diagnosed with PCa were prospectively enrolled in this phase 2 trial. A combination of uPAR PET and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) was performed, and the SUV in the primary tumor, as delineated by mpMRI, was measured by 2 independent readers. The correlation between the SUV and the Gleason score obtained by biopsy was assessed. Results: A total of 27 patients had histologically verified PCa visible on mpMRI and constituted the study population. There was a positive correlation between the SUVmax and the Gleason score (Spearman rho = 0.55; P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00) for discriminating a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 3 + 4 from a Gleason score of less than or equal to 3 + 3. A cutoff for the tumor SUVmax could be established with a sensitivity of 96% (79%-99%) and a specificity of 75% (30%-95%) for detecting a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 3 + 4. For discriminating a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 4 + 3 from a Gleason score of less than or equal to 3 + 4, a cutoff could be established for detecting a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 4 + 3 with a sensitivity of 93% (69%-99%) and a specificity of 62% (36%-82%). Conclusion: SUV measurements from uPAR PET in primary tumors, as delineated by mpMRI, showed a significant correlation with the Gleason score, and the tumor SUVmax was able to discriminate between low-risk Gleason score profiles and intermediate risk Gleason score profiles with a high diagnostic accuracy. Consequently, uPAR PET/MRI could be a promising method for the noninvasive evaluation of PCa and might reduce the need for repeated biopsies (e.g., in active surveillance).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据